Archive for category NME

Laura Snapes’ Review of “Teen Dream” by Beach House

Artist: Beach House

Album: Teen Dream

Reviewer: Laura Snapes

NME, 2010

Writing Disorders: Purple Hemorrhage, Idea Fever







Longest Sentence: 59 words

WTF: “that’d be as churlish as complaining that a masseuse’s hands were too soft while reclining on a goosedown quilt”



Laura, I haven’t featured many women on RipFork so far. It’s not that I have a problem with ragging on a girl’s review, but rather just that it’s usually the guys who write torrid essays about bands. I just couldn’t resist the siren call of your wordy flourish, though. If you’d traded NME’s thumbnail of the album art for a picture of a buxom maiden thrusting her cans off the prow of a merchantman, you could have sold this review as a Harlequin romance and bled some old women dry.

Before we get to your choicest bits of silky language, though, let’s begin with a slice of your opening paragraph. It had my brain in knots.

“Rather than cutting them through the middle and counting the rings, it’s far easier to pinpoint when someone was a teenager by the places where they used to while away the hours – the diner, a roller-disco, a drive-in movie.”

I tried, but I just couldn’t figure out the logic behind this sentence, Laura. There’s a far easier way of pinpointing when someone was a teenager than just asking how old they are? Wouldn’t knowing where someone hung out tell you WHERE he or she was as a teenager more than when? Couldn’t you just make an assessment of their age based on their appearance if you’re standing there asking them where they hung out in days of yore? All that seems easier than hypothesizing about when a person might have been hanging out at a particular diner. However, as a man who grew up counting the rings of the trees that kept him warm through the winters, I do like that metaphor. Trees are good.

My confusion didn’t stop with your intro. Along came your bit about the band’s previous albums:

“the break with the spidery, sparse sound of their first two albums affords them far fewer places to hide.”

Ah yes, because spidery, sparse sound encompasses 99.9% of the known world of music. What exactly does spidery sound…sound like? Completely inaudible – or if it’s big enough, a flutter of hairy legs pattering across skin right before you shriek bloody murder? Jesus, how did music become such a profitable venture if that’s the case?

I’m just joshing, Laura. I’m sure you meant something that made sense in your mind. Like this:

“unlike some of their woozy brethren, it manages to paint a tremendously authentic portrait of youth and young love”

So this band manages to incorporate the individual circumstances of millions of young people and their intensely varied relationships with one another across geographic and social lines? That task seems a bit Herculean for any one band. Do you think maybe some of their woozy brethren were just writing songs that didn’t quite align with your own personal experience of young love?

I did promise I’d touch on your silky language, and here’s my favorite bit:

“Whereas previously they’ve shuffled in with spindly shakers, there’s a delicate pride when Scally’s waltzing guitar leads the way for Legrand’s heavenly “Aaahs” and the emboldened, lolloping sound that curves and swoops, as if exploring the contours of another’s body with slow, febrile urgency, before galloping away in shimmering cymbals.”

Laura, I’m sorry, but I’m laughing my ass off over here. I’m sure that bit was meant to be sensual, but I’m looking at the phrase “galloping away in shimmering cymbals” and I’m picturing a centaur slamming cymbals together while charging away from a woman he just groped. It’s cool if you want to lead us into a world of erotic song description, but when the metaphors are mashed together into one giant 50-word sentence, it can get confusing fast.

Then again, you don’t do much better when you keep it short:

“On ‘Norway’ she stretches the words long beyond their natural conclusion, inviting us to hibernate in the myriad syllables.”

Does she also remind us to boost our fat stores on notes and harmonies in the forest before entering her syllable den for the long winter? What’s the musical equivalent of beetle grubs? Those are key – lots of nutritious fat.

Don’t worry. A couple more gripes, then I’ll let you go, Laura.

“Much like their good friends Grizzly Bear, Beach House have made testy, breathy cooing and harmonising into an artform scant seen since the days of the Gregorian chant.”

You mean an art form scant HEARD since the days of Gregorian chant? Seeing someone cooing and harmonizing usually just amounts to seeing someone making fish lips. And if you were able to pluck a contemporary example of it so easily, don’t you think it’s rather likely there’s an ample store between present day and the heyday of the Franks?

“the odd lyrical cliché remains – as on ‘Better Times’, where Victoria questions, “How much longer can you play with fire/Before you turn into liar?” a tad gratingly. But it’s a tiny niggle.”

If it’s a tiny niggle, then why did you feel the need to mention it? If you’d cut out your slight discomfort with the word “liar” rhyming with “fire,” you might have cut your review to a more manageable 900 words. At 938, it is a tad grating, you know. But it’s also a lot of fun. Thanks for racking one up for the girls, Laura.

Tags: ,

Rebecca Robinson’s Review of “Welcome to the Walk Alone” by The Rumble Strips

link to Rebecca Robinson's review of "Welcome to the Walk Alone" by the Rumble StripsArtist: The Rumble Strips

Album: Welcome to the Walk Alone

Reviewer: Rebecca Robinson

NME, 2009

Writing Disorders: Infectious Punctuation, Scorn Disease, Detachment Syndrome







Number of Hyphens: 25

Longest Sentence: 59 words

Most Emo Phrase: the underlying laziness that makes its advert-friendly wipe-clean Stepford Wives-rock so hard to stomach.




I was going to go a day without posting since there were too many 6.8’s and 7.0’s to really sink my teeth into, but luckily I got this baby gift wrapped in my inbox. Thanks to Morwenna Ferrier for sending me such a choice morsel from one of NME’s summer issues, written by Rebecca Robinson.

Rebecca, you seem a little angry. And I figure it’s more than just knowing you’ll never beat out Miss Texas 2009 on a Google search for your name. Take this bit you wrote, for instance:

The Next Big Thing turns out to be just another indie-by-numbers, stadium-filling, over-produced, shamelessly derivative, five-man, smug-faced shit factory.

David Attenborough: A solitary and pugnacious creature, the Rebecca Robinson will not take kindly to burgeoning indie bands that don’t tickle her fancy. A full-grown female will mount a stout defense, hurling sequences of hyphenated phrases with reckless abandon. If this formidable array should prove unsuccessful at deterring the bands, the enraged female Robinson will somersault into a handstand, spraying a cloud of longwinded insults from specialized anal glands. Goodness, here comes the cloud!

‘Mark Ronson-produced’ has already become synonymous with ‘garish and unlistenable’

This album is the solitary cockroach scuttling around in the post-apocalyptic nuclear wasteground of British music circa-2001

It’s shameful. Well presented and immaculately recorded, but still shit sub-Maccabees schlock.

Becca, there are plenty of bands I haven’t particularly enjoyed. And I too wrote like a craven asshole when I reviewed music. But I have to say that even at my most verbose and dickish, I never attacked a band with the kind of drama queen fury that you unleashed on these Rumble Strip fellows. “Exaggeration” is a bit of an understatement when describing what you scribbled out here. Example number one:

‘Welcome To The Walk Alone’ may have the skeletal blueprint of pop genius running through it like words in a stick of rock but it verges on insulting.

Really? You’re insulted by that? I don’t like to make generalizations, but most folks are usually insulted by things like paraplegic jokes, racism, sexism, genocide – that kind of stuff. But I suppose that since whatever you were talking about only verged on insulting, you can save your energy for the off chance of being told you have sardine breath when you haven’t eaten fish.

Let’s take a gander at some more hyperbole, shall we?

Charlie Waller’s voice verges on the vomit-inducing.

Are you serious? Listening to this album actually made you nauseous to a point just shy of reverse peristalsis? You might want to get that checked out, Becca, because it ain’t natural. If you nearly blow chunks when you hear some pop guitars and a falsetto, do you spontaneously combust when someone mentions child trafficking?

But I get it. I understand how easy it is to write about how a band is ruining western civilization when the most heat you’ll catch for it is a couple of miffed comments in the page footer. It’s an opinion by law. But Becca, I have a problem with your choice of pronouns when doing it. You see, you have a tendency to avoid owning your dickhead diatribes by writing your opinions as if they were formulated by someone other than you. Ahem…

We can’t help pining for the vibrant and enthused band

we’re saved the inevitable crushing disappointment

We like to imagine the recording process involved Ronson beating them with sticks and screaming

We barely remember what ‘Sweet Heart Hooligan’ sounds like

Look, Becca, I know it’s probably embarrassing for you to write that you personally like to imagine a producer beating a band with sticks, but please don’t include the rest of us without our say-so. Just like Jeffrey Lebowski doesn’t quite get away with the royal we…you know, the editorial…you don’t speak for me. Unless you list at least one other person who agreed with you, then write in the first person singular. At least then you own your opinion. And after savaging a band you’ve never met because they played this note this way or that chord that way, the least you can do is admit you’re the one who pulled the trigger on their reputation.

I’ll be keeping my eye out for you in the future, Becca. And I’ll be sure to stay downwind.

Tags: , ,

Ben Patashnik’s Review of “The Fame Monster” by Lady Gaga

Link to Ben Patashnik's Review of "The Fame Monster" by Lady GagaArtist: Lady Gaga

Album: The Fame Monster

Reviewer: Ben Patashnik

NME, 2009

Writing Disorders: Ambiguity Sickness







Most Emo Phrase: “As someone who believes hardcore punk to be mankind’s highest artform, Lady GaGa is the antithesis of my fucking soul”




Hi, Ben. Since today Pitchfork is featuring albums that have names approaching 200-characters in length, I figured I’d venture overseas instead. Thankfully I found your bit on Lady Gaga. Goodness gracious, you don’t pull any punches on this scourge of the land I’ve been hearing about…this “popular music.”

“Let’s just get this out of the way, shall we? About 99 per cent of pop is drudging twuntery assembled by blank-eyed robots who are unjustly rewarded with mountains of cash, while all my favourite bands languish and die in places like Tacoma, Washington.

Kind of like how 99% of hardcore is a carbon copy of Black Flag? Not that I listen to nearly enough hardcore to make that statement confidently, but since we’re flinging hyperbole around, I have about as much a chance of being right as you do.

Bitching about pop musicians and the evil music industry is getting old. It’s easy to say that Adam Lambert, Rihanna, or the New Kids on the Block curdle civilization’s milk, or that Sony and EMI are hell-bent on destroying “good” music and force-feeding the masses a lump of soma with every flick of the FM switch. But people buy music they like, just like they always have. And no matter how many hardcore-lovers write purple prose labeling those millions of free consumers as idiots, music is still going to be driven by taste. If music was porn, then pop would be straight-up screwing and hardcore punk cartoon sex. It’s about taste and pleasure. Just as most people don’t get off watching Tinkerbell getting molested by Peter Pan, most people don’t find particular solace in muddled diatribes against Margaret Thatcher set to a 220 beat.

Furthermore, Ben, at a time when radio is about as obsolete as the MacDonald’s McDLT, the pop-is-murder argument no longer has much of a leg to stand on in this free listening environment called the internet. This generation of Pandora, Grooveshark, and MOG still sends heroes up the pop charts. They do it because they like the music.

…By the way, I had to look up “twuntery.” Here’s what I got:

“Extreme exhibitions of silliness, stupdity, child-like behaviour, tomfoolery, shenanigans, capers, joking-around, monkey business, larking about, toungue-in-cheek leg-pulling and/or high-jinks”

Wow, throw a Mohawk on that and call it hardcore.

Jokes aside, you write like a drama queen, Ben.

“Bad Romance” would be hateful if it didn’t have a chorus so wonderfully big it dwarfs the industry of a million angry dudes with guitars.”

I think it depends on which angry dudes with guitars you’re talking about. If you mean hardcore dudes, then I don’t think it takes much more than a hummable melody to dwarf them. But more to the point, what do you mean by “hateful?” Do you mean that you personally would hate this song without the chorus or that the song itself is hateful without the chorus? Was “Rah-Rah-Ah-Ah-Ah” the opening line in “Mein Kampf” or something?

Bring on the picky-eater BS:

“Those new songs are fine, even though “Dance in the Dark” and “Monster” are slightly too disposable”

So…they retain too much of a ground-turkey smell to be recycled or are too narrow to be fashioned into coin containers? Do you mean that those songs don’t have as much replay value as the others do in your humble opinion? You might try slightly writing that in the future.

I’m sure you have to go catch that sell-out crowd of 10 at the hardcore show, Ben, so I’m going to end this on my favorite bit of self-serving nonsense you managed to pull out of the ether:

“In the same way as Radiohead battle computers and learn new instruments to hew their sculptures while Fuck Buttons and HEALTH discover new sonic languages, she uses pop, its producers and masks and all its artifice, as her tool of self-expression.”

So a musician uses something to do with music to make music? Wow, deep man.

Tags:

John Doran’s Review of Turning the Mind by Maps

John Doran's Review of Turning the Mind by MapsArtist: Maps

Album: Turning the Mind

Reviewer: John Doran

NME, 2009

Writing Disorders: Scorn Disease







Most Emo Phrase: “If I wanted to go to church I would do. In full corpse paint armed with a bucket full of petrol, a box of matches and Mayhem on my iPod”




Thank you, John. You proved to me that bad music writing is not a strictly American phenomenon. In fact, I’m now wondering if maybe Britain first spawned loquacious, bitter writing about the musical arts and America just picked it up as a pastime.

Your opening paragraph is amazing.

“What is it at the moment with all this half-arsed, evangelical Christian hymn-aping synth music masquerading as dream-pop or screen-gaze? If I wanted to go to church I would do. In full corpse paint armed with a bucket full of petrol, a box of matches and Mayhem on my iPod. This arpeggiated, over-produced, glossy, easy listening music goes so far in the direction of being unchallenging it actually becomes aggressively offensive.”

Dude, calm down. It’s an album. An album of music. If you’re this wound-up over such a trifling thing, I’d hate to think of the homicidal epithets you’d rant when someone mentions Darfur.

Seriously, do you think this is badass? Badass is diving into a surging river to save a drowning woman. It’s balancing on a moving motorcycle and blowing up a car with a Beretta. Badass is not typing up a furious diatribe about how you’d burn down a church while listening to Norwegian metal and somehow connecting it to your poor opinion of an album. That’s emo. Really emo. Oh yes, in case you didn’t realize, you write for a magazine that more often than not features men in eye shadow on the cover. Emo.

This angry review is so wonderfully British that it makes me giggle.

“Such is the sugary onslaught of sparkling and synthesized major key pap, listening to it is like being beaten to death by a room full of wrinkled Women’s Institute ladies armed with Battenburg cakes.”

Um…I’m going to assume one of two things. Either you have a very active imagination, or you were actually beaten by wrinkled women with cakes. And do you know who really hates major key pap? Emo kids.

When you finally get around to talking about the songs, the genius of John Doran flows forth like a mighty river.

“leaving us with obviously titled songs like “I Dream of Crystal,” “Valium in the Sunshine,” and “A Memory of Clouds. (one of these is made up, but you can’t tell, can you?)”

Call me crazy, but I think more obviously-titled songs might be called “Dreams,” “Valium,” or “Memory.” But you’re the ace at the obvious, John, not me. And wham bam, man, you also rival the Norse god Loki in parenthetical trickery. One of the songs was made up! That’s knee-slapping good. I LOVE the little games you play in your writing! Making up a song title in jest! Tee-hee! Let’s go burn a church!

And then there’s your conclusion, which somehow has something to do with something.

“you’re left thinking that those yodelling fucking elf-botherers Sigur Ros have got a lot to answer for”

Yeah, you Icelandic FUCKERS! You better stop yodeling or John Doran is going to burn you with metal! Emo metal forged in the smithees of NME.

Keep up the badassery, emo John.

Tags: