To this guy:
Eric, I’m impressed you’ve stood your ground on my challenge. Good. That’s the first step. Now, I’m going to get this rolling with a little recap. To you I paid battle’s invitation by knife fight in the written world: cold, pointed words against a foe.
As you strode into the ring, losing your jacket and rolling up your sleeves, you produced from a sheath concealed behind your neck…the 1900-word essay.
This is Mortal Kombat, dude, not fey games of tag after a good reading of Byron. You could have DUG into me, Eric. I even glimpsed fleeting merit scrolling down the small book you wrote for me at 3 in the morning. Then I thought to myself, “Wow, why read this when porn’s a click away?” I started skimming. Jesus man, we’re not two old chums from the academy locked in a cursive game of Risk. We hardly know each other. Did you actually expect me to methodically read through your five-page English paper or were you just producing a manuscript for posterity?
If someone scrubs his boot into your persuasion, this is what you do? You attack him with the stuff he’s already ridiculed you about not two months ago? You bore him into basalt before the next foot-noted strike? I don’t recall Dutch ever taking that approach. Dutch would have his skull bouncing in the predator’s crotch-mounted trophy case pulling that kind of shit.
Now, Eric, I’m giving you another shot. If you’re not going to meet my knife with a blade, then I’m disappointed in you. You see, I don’t have a problem with SOMETHING you wrote. I got a problem with what you write. And my respect for you is going to be kissing the cow pie if you can’t come up with something better to stall my engine.
Here’s something to mull your cider, Eric:
Remember that line I wrote in my letter to you? You know; the one about the children of Ungoliant so eager to lap up your cold curds? Ungoliant was a hideous thing in Tolkien’s lore. In fact, her heart was so twisted by her ceaseless hunger that she bit and drained light from the world. I don’t respect what you do to music and its makers. I think it poison. That’s my conviction. And I will take my phial given by the lady, and I will jam it in your eyes until you stay your plague on music.
I’m not finished. Before you go deliberate your options, you’re going to park yourself and watch this. You’re going to watch and imagine I stole the fish you caught to feed your family in the skeezy part of Italy.
You gonna put up a fight for that fish or you gonna granny shot another book at me?
*No, you’re not Ungoliant. You a kid.
Jayson Greene's Review of "WWI" by White Whale
Jonathan Dean's Review of "///Y/" by M.I.A.
Daniel Yates' Review of "Disconnect from Desire" by School of Seven Bells
Jakob Dorof's Review of "Topp Stemning Pa Lokal Bar" by Casiokids
Jayson Greene's Review of "Recovery" by Eminem
John Calvert's Review of "Nonstop " by Black Francis
#1 by tommy on March 8, 2010 - 12:44 am
Quote
not a great reply man. you didn’t come back on any of his points. you might as well have just said “you’re an asshole” and left it at that. That’s about all this amounted to.
#2 by Alex on March 8, 2010 - 1:27 am
Quote
@Tommy
Well, seeing that Harvey’s counterpoints were: “I write for a committee of 5 people that I chose myself” and “I don’t need to add to society because no one else ‘truly’ does”, he kinda proves himself useless to everyone.
Yeah, that’s right.
“I think there are very, very few people who are lucky enough, smart enough, and who can sacrifice enough of their time and energy, to add to society in a meaningful or lasting way.”
He thinks you might as well give up now, because no one ever adds to society.
#3 by Luke on March 8, 2010 - 1:48 am
Quote
“I didn’t read it because it was too long” is not exactly a strong intellectual pillar to stand on man.
Neither is “he wasn’t mean enough.”
You’re criticizing people for ‘not adding to society’ when this blog is basically a legitimized troll.
#4 by Alex on March 8, 2010 - 4:29 am
Quote
@Luke
Granted, one of his goals was “filter tons of data into something manageable and readable”, which I think we can all agree he kinda failed on.
Troll: “One who posts a deliberately provocative message to a newsgroup or message board with the intention of causing maximum disruption and argument”
Seeing as you are coming here to bash Matt on /his/ website… you fit the definition better than he does.
#5 by tim on March 8, 2010 - 3:54 pm
Quote
you think this contributes to society tho?
#6 by WillBright on March 8, 2010 - 7:44 pm
Quote
Ah, now I see. It’s a masochistic exercise. The self-hating bully wants to get flogged, and pouts when his opponent actually … responds honestly. Sorry Wendus, you’re funny sometimes and occasionally sharp, but this just makes ya look sad.
You’re better off writing more scathing critiques of “Matt Wendus.” Eventually you’ll implode and be done with the whole mess.
#7 by Todd on March 9, 2010 - 10:58 am
Quote
Jeez Will, I can smell the self-serving even though the interwebs