Album: Jet Lag
Reviewer: Larry Fitzmaurice
Writing Disorders: Idea Fever, Purple Hemorrhage
Critic Talk: “bizarre pop mutations,” “its more straightforward cousin,” “absurdist yarns that hold a weird car-crash fascination”
I want to take things slow here, Larry. I’m normally gung-ho ’bout reaming someone’s review without any foreplay, but I want shift down to second for a tick. Let’s set the mood — you know, dim the lights, put on our lacy thongs, and maybe see what kind of an album you’re dumping on here:
“The songs on the debut full-length from WHY? drummer Josiah Wolf were inspired by the dissolution of an 11-year relationship, as well as Wolf’s move back to the Midwest after years of living in California.”
And what better way to cheer the guy up than to give his debut album an F? I guess he had it coming though:
“Dropping a breakup album for your first LP seems a risky move. Listeners are just starting to get to know you, after all.”
Larry, here’s something to kick around your cortex. Do you think it’s a risky move because A), listeners are alienated by debut breakup albums, or B), that a music critic might have the gall to say an artist doesn’t provide the right soundtrack to his own emotional turmoil? I’m casting my lot in column B, but let’s see if we can work out yours:
“If Wolf could be accused of lyrical overcompensation, the opposite could be said about the music.”
“offbeat musings on praying naked in the shower…sound forced”
“Wearing your heart on your sleeve is one thing, but musically, Josiah Wolf isn’t really taking any risks here”
So…this guy made a risky move by not really taking any risks? I don’t follow. Also, how is it offbeat to mention praying naked on a record dominated by breakup stories? That don’t seem forced to me. You sure you weren’t just reaching for something to bust this guy’s chops on? Would you have gushed over this release if Wolf had skipped on the “attempts at surrealism” and just stuck to “the grief-stricken script?” I’m not convinced.
Know what? Put your pants back on, Larry. I’m done with cuddling. Just grab a shovel instead so we can start pitching manure. Your second paragraph is a mess:
“Meanwhile, “Unused ‘I love you’s build up” in his throat in the somewhat cornily named “The Apart Meant”, after expressing the lonely sentiment that “For 11 years/ We didn’t touch another/ And now I can’t sleep,” in “Skull in the Ice”.”
Jesus Christ man, you can PARAPHRASE what the guy’s saying. Seems like he’d be more miffed you rated his debut album a 5.6 than if you summed up what he’s singing without direct quotes. Consider for a moment what you’ve done here. You’ve distinguished both song names and song lyrics by fencing them off with quotation marks. In that sentence above, the quoted bits outnumber the words holding them together. That’s not such a great recipe for comprehension cookies. And what’s with the pussy-footing adverbs? “Somewhat cornily?” Just be a man and say you’d name another man’s breakup song something else.
Did I mention pussy-footing? Here’s a nice pair of labia loafers:
“sort of competent but dull chamber-pop”
“half-decent ideas haphazardly grouped together”
Larry, where I come from, the phrase “sort of” is a mark of shame. Says a man’s too lazy to come up with a better word. If you can type a 500+ word review, you can consult a thesaurus. Also, isn’t “half-decent” 25% on the scale from horrible to excellent? Just say “bad.” In the meantime, careful you don’t slip on them clam waders.
Like other lice, you waited till the last paragraph to mention anything you liked about the album you’d just molested in the parking lot. Scratch that. I don’t even really know if there was any enjoyment on your end. All you did was give a wordy description of a couple songs without words like “haphazardly” or “jammed-together”
“Opener “The Trailer and the Truck” stretches and yawns via elongated guitar bends and bursts of concentrated drumming, while “Is the Body Hung” rolls with freak-folk touches and Wolf’s cracked vocals.”
Here’s a bit of advice, Larry. If you’re going to kick a musician in the crotch, try giving him the shiny penny before the boot in the pecker. Bit of etiquette, you might say.
Now put on that thong. Let’s see those creamy thighs.

Tom Breihan's Review of "S-M 2: Abyss in B Minor" By Serena-Maneesh
Jayson Greene's Review of "Thug Motivation 103" by Young Jeezy
Paul Thompson's Review of "Spills Out" by Pterodactyl
Gabe Vodicka's Review of "Hurley" by Weezer
Rudy Klapper's Review of "Teenage Dream" by Katy Perry
William Grant's Review of "The Illusion of Safety" by The Hoosiers
#1 by cooper on March 9, 2010 - 1:01 pm
Quote
so glad you decided to rip on this review. pretty much all the reviews of reviews you do are spot on, but this one i thought was especially awful and frustrated me beyond belief to have read. at least i know there are still some reasonable people out there.
#2 by Sheen on June 27, 2010 - 10:50 pm
Quote
You’re an idiot for doing this.
#3 by Matt Wendus on June 28, 2010 - 7:29 am
Quote
For doing what?
#4 by Twat on July 5, 2010 - 3:43 am
Quote
You suck. Ripping on his word choice doesn’t make the album better, this re-review actually makes me hate it much, much more. This is the type of snobbery that doesn’t have any merit because you’re a fucking idiot
#5 by Matt Wendus on July 5, 2010 - 8:05 am
Quote
But it has enough merit to merit you telling me it has no merit?
#6 by hipster on July 20, 2010 - 6:16 pm
Quote
Wow. I am consistently awestruck by your re-reviews of pitchfork’s writers’ hard work. What are the guys over at ripfork paying you for this kind of consistently great work? It must be a lot more than the guys over at pitchfork because they get paid to listen to albums and write reviews and you have to do pretty much DOUBLE the work and THEN re-review their original stuff! If you ever get free from what seems to be such a great busy schedule of wasting your time re-reviewing work that people actually get paid to do why dont you get off your fucking ass and get a real job you fucking idiot. Nothing like another complainer who clearly cant get any other work venting to an audience of also completely pathetic morons to brighten anyone’s day.
Keep Up the good Work,
Your Biggest Fan
#7 by Matt Wendus on July 20, 2010 - 6:21 pm
Quote
I am the guy.
#8 by Zach Lee on July 26, 2010 - 10:48 am
Quote
Anyone who refers to themselves as ‘hipster’ should be executed on live television.
#9 by Sam Smackson on August 2, 2010 - 1:39 pm
Quote
Re-reviewing? Get a fucking life.
#10 by Matt Wendus on August 2, 2010 - 1:40 pm
Quote
I don’t need one.
#11 by Sam Smackson on August 2, 2010 - 1:41 pm
Quote
Also, “RipFork”? I’m laughing at you from far away.
#12 by Sam Smackson on August 2, 2010 - 1:43 pm
Quote
Also, “Ripped by RipFork”? Oh my god, this is hysterical.
YOU’VE BEEN RIPPED, BRO! BY RIPFORK!
Okay, I’m done here. Fuck your life.
#13 by Matt Wendus on August 2, 2010 - 1:51 pm
Quote
Don’t I need one first?
#14 by what on August 10, 2010 - 3:00 am
Quote
when the reviewer said it was a risky move he was talking about dropping a breakup album as first album…..
when the reviewer said he wasn’t taking any risks musically, he was talking about the MUSIC !!!
so i dont really get your point when you say… “this guy made a risky move by not really taking any risks?
THIS IS STUPID
find something better to do with your time
#15 by Matt Wendus on August 11, 2010 - 9:08 am
Quote
Why are you typing at me so hard?
#16 by Christopher on August 20, 2010 - 1:57 am
Quote
Mr. Fitzmaurice should expend an ounce (just an ounce) researching those whom he critiques. His latest review, !!!’s ‘Strange Weather, Isn’t It?’, fails to mention the late Jerry Fuchs, who had been !!!’s drummer since 2003. One would think that the late drummer of a band who “heads down the rhythmic rabbit hole” (Fitz quote) is worthy of a respectable mention in his review but apparently not.
#17 by james on October 15, 2010 - 4:42 am
Quote
the funniest part about these posts:
the guys telling the guy that he needs to “do something better with your life” or “get a fucking life” for re-reviewing a pitchfork review. who the fuck are you? what are you doing? you are insulting a guy for insulting a guy that insulted a musician.
-observer
#18 by jebus on April 13, 2011 - 8:38 pm
Quote
This is amazing. Thanks for doing what you do. This shit needs to be done
#19 by Oh hai on April 14, 2011 - 12:21 am
Quote
I love this, really. Someone needs to rip into Pitchfork for their complete and utter pretentiousness. All of these haters gonna hate, but it’s not like they haven’t bitched about something that upsets them before. Ridiculous. Keep up the good sexy work.
#20 by Ana@watford hotels on May 25, 2011 - 11:10 am
Quote
The blog is very informative and has a great insight. You are right about that.
#21 by Minisite Design on June 6, 2011 - 10:26 am
Quote
This type of blog is somewhat unique. But for those who doesn’t like the idea will hate it. Hope there will be a Ripfork – Ripping Music Critics 2011 and beyond. Minisite
Design
#22 by Liam on July 5, 2011 - 9:57 am
Quote
“labia loafers”. Arf!
#23 by alVionne on September 8, 2011 - 12:22 am
Quote
the only merit i’ll give pitchfork is that they do manage to be a cultural director (and no, i’m not going to elaborate on that because no one wants to be called part of a hive culture). however i’ll give them this merit too: five writers (thus far) are INCREDIBLY EASY to reduce to tears, ERs, and/or spontaneous girlfriend-free states.
essentially, iRL trolling recommended, unless i’m the only one here who knows how to use a fist, boot, or bottle of clonazepam.
#24 by Matt Wendus on September 8, 2011 - 12:26 am
Quote
I don’t understand what you’re talking about.
#25 by sky vorpal on October 7, 2011 - 10:59 am
Quote
i just read a dumping review of young prisms’ “friends for now” by this idiot Larry Fitzmaurice (http://pitchfork.com/reviews/albums/15063-friends-for-now/).
it’s shockingly ignorant and insulting. this is a great record.