Album: Fire like This
Reviewer: Jude Clarke
Writing Disorders: Idea Fever
Most Emo Phrase: “glammed-up, rocked-out tales of urban angst”
Most Sterile Phrase: “The most enjoyable moments are those that deviate from this pattern”
Hey Jude, you didn’t exactly take a sad song and make it BeEettttter. If I’d to pick, I’d say your writing’s a salty wet clam. A cold wet clam.
“Anyone familiar with their first one will certainly not be surprised by anything they find here, but will it sustain the interest of current fans, and is it likely to pick up any new ones along the way?”
What is this, Jude? A teaser for tomorrow’s episode of “One Life to Live?” As Stacey’s plot unfurls, Gigi has to give up Rex to save Shane. With the love of her life gone, is she likely to pick up any new ones along the way? Ooooh, I wanna know. What we got coming, Jude?
“Whereas somehow in 2008 the glammed-up, rocked-out tales of urban angst and Boredom By The Sea felt fresh and engaging, here the repetition of many of those tropes begins to seem more than a little, well, repetitious.”
Distance from “whereas” to “here?” 21 words. EH.
You got issues with clarity, Jude. But you know what? It’s got me thinking. How about I take you under my wing? You want to play Happy to my Chubbs and whittle down them thoughts? Maybe with a little practice, people’ll start reading your sentences instead of just skipping to the rating. Here’s how it works. I’m going to pair some of your phrases with a rewrite apiece and a few suggestions.
“A favoured device is that of taking a line of lyric”
“The band will often take a lyric”
Jude, you don’t have to attach a unit of measure to a lyric’s length. A line in a song is a lyric. And what’s with that marshmallow filling you stuffed in there? If Uncle Owen ever spied you for sale at the Jawa flea market, he’d have had this to say: “there’s too much crap coming out of her head.” Here’s something to try, Jude. After you finish writing your next review, go back through and trim it short as you can without losing your arguments. You might find you can do without “that of.”
Next!
“This is clearly used with the intent of capturing and reflecting a certain urgency, rage, ire, and as such can prove effective.”
“Proven effective, it captures urgency, ire, and rage.”
Jude, why the hell did you follow a comma with “and” at the end of a noun sequence? Rather, why’d you follow it with anything but another noun? I’m not saying what you wrote was grammatically inaccurate. It just confounds the brain. Also, if a band “captures” emotions in its music, that’s the same as reflecting them. You don’t need both. Honest to god, you don’t need any more conjunctions in this review. And come on, “a certain urgency?” Isn’t every urgency a certain urgency? Thought so. EDIT.
“The same influence can also be heard (as, indeed, is acknowledged by the band in the album’s accompanying press information) in forthcoming single Light It Up.”
“According to the band, new single Light It Up features the same influence.”
Jesus, dude. Why would a band dispute a claim taken from its own press release? I assume that’s why you included that giant parenthetical act of libel protection. You wouldn’t write it to sound like the band agreed with your brilliant assessment of its influence, would you? You know Jude, sometimes things sound sexier when you don’t include the footnote.
And finally…
“Admittedly a more appealing (fresh sounding, enthusiastic, driven) live prospect than they now appear on record, the lack of anything very much in the way of originality or development thus far in their recorded material does not bode too positively for their future.”
“I think they’d sound fresher live than on record, but their lack of originality might not bode well.”
Jude, I don’t need a reminder that a band’s future is what’s affected by the present. Read the phrase “bodes well for their past” and you get the picture. By the way, stuffing 3 adjectives in a display case to explain what you meant by the word “appealing” is ridiculous. Just pick one of those words and roll with it. I chose “fresher” and trimmed that bloated bit about originality and development you stuffed in there. Bear in mind this is your conclusion. If you can’t thump your shield without a lengthy baton twirl, I can’t imagine anyone staying that late to tremble.
Keep these suggestions in mind, Jude. If anything, the world needs more folks of few words.

Jess Harvell's Review of Kaleidoscope by Tiesto
William Grant's Review of "The Illusion of Safety" by The Hoosiers
Jess Harvell's Review of "Isis/Melvins" Split by Isis and The Melvins
Jared Bier's Review of "As Good as Gone" by Nudge
Jeff Weiss' Review of "Nightmare" by Avenged Sevenfold
Jonathan Dean's Review of "///Y/" by M.I.A.
#1 by Huntronik on March 17, 2010 - 4:20 pm
Quote
this review was far better than the last one by laura snapes. the snapes reviews was absolutely awful and was rightly eviscerated. this one’s just bulky and careless.
#2 by bandwagon on March 23, 2010 - 2:10 am
Quote
… but still quiet terrible. The sentences seem stretched just to fill some space. Increasing the font size might have been a better idea. And who needs three definitions of “Appealing”? In fact, we don’t even need one. Appealing itself is an adjective or isn’t it?
#3 by Ash on March 25, 2010 - 6:30 am
Quote
It’s a shame you had to pick on Jude’s writing. Not only is she a lovely human being, she also makes the best cupcakes I’ve ever tasted. Sadly, you’ll never get to know either having now gratuitously deconstructed her excellent work.
#4 by Matt Wendus on March 25, 2010 - 7:48 am
Quote
Read the phrase “gratuitously deconstructed excellent work” and ponder that for a tick in the context of this site.
#5 by Huntronik on March 25, 2010 - 12:07 pm
Quote
People take themselves too serious. I bet she spent a few days writing her review, but how long do you think the band took in creating the album?
#6 by Laura on March 25, 2010 - 5:55 pm
Quote
What Ash said! Never will you be the beneficiary of one of Jude’s chocolate orange cupcakes…
#7 by Lauren on June 21, 2010 - 1:44 pm
Quote
You lot are such a bunch of tossers. If you’re such good little music journos, why don’t you start your own blog and overthrow all the outlets you’re criticising? Sad little people with no lives.