<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Chris Molnar&#8217;s Review of &#8220;East of Eden&#8221; by Taken by Trees</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ripfork.com/2010/02/chris-molnars-review-of-east-of-eden-by-taken-by-trees/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ripfork.com/2010/02/chris-molnars-review-of-east-of-eden-by-taken-by-trees/</link>
	<description>Ripping Music Critics Since 2009</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 18:38:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://ripfork.com/2010/02/chris-molnars-review-of-east-of-eden-by-taken-by-trees/comment-page-1/#comment-360</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Apr 2010 12:52:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ripfork.com/?p=414#comment-360</guid>
		<description>You have a more regular updating schedule than Cokemachineglow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You have a more regular updating schedule than Cokemachineglow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://ripfork.com/2010/02/chris-molnars-review-of-east-of-eden-by-taken-by-trees/comment-page-1/#comment-202</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 16:40:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ripfork.com/?p=414#comment-202</guid>
		<description>So people are criticizing you for a tendency to criticize a music criticism site. Well let me criticize your criticizers by criticizing: &quot;More Pitchfork!&quot;

Now that you mention it, I do notice that people tend to say that they like an album despite such and such qualities. If it didn&#039;t have quirks, it would be generic music then... which I&#039;m sure they&#039;d then criticize it for.

The word &quot;criticize&quot; now looks funny.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So people are criticizing you for a tendency to criticize a music criticism site. Well let me criticize your criticizers by criticizing: &#8220;More Pitchfork!&#8221;</p>
<p>Now that you mention it, I do notice that people tend to say that they like an album despite such and such qualities. If it didn&#8217;t have quirks, it would be generic music then&#8230; which I&#8217;m sure they&#8217;d then criticize it for.</p>
<p>The word &#8220;criticize&#8221; now looks funny.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

