Album: Neon Bible
Reviewer: Matt Wendus
Writing Disorders: Purple Hemorrhage, Ambiguity Sickness
Most Emo Phrase: “jaunty swings that belie the gloomy temperament”
Matt, this is the second time you’ve been featured on RipFork and this review has many of the hallmarks of your worst work: the dogged refusal to use the first person, the ample use of BS to pad paragraphs, and the liberal use of silly, drawn-out metaphors to describe things that are best left for ears to figure out. Often you combine several of these traits into a single sentence:
“Neon Bible settles into a more restrained sound that speaks in statements rather than the aorta spurts of the hyper-personal Funeral”
Speaks in statements? So the album is built on something other than questions or commands? Whoa, call the International Board of Piercing Insight, I think we’ve got a shoe-in here. By the way, how does one speak in aorta spurts? I’m rather glad they don’t offer that language as a high school elective.
“While Neon Bible has its fair share of tracks that tickle the tear ducts, it’s more concerned with bleakness on a broader scale”
First of all, how can an album be concerned with anything? It’s an inanimate object. A mechanism can make it spin so that a laser or needle can translate its data into sound. That’s not sentience. Second, how do you have any idea what the band is concerned with in the making of their album? Have you ever spoken to Arcade Fire? No. There’s as much of a chance of Win Butler being concerned with bleakness on a narrower scale as there is of him being concerned with bleakness on a broader scale. If you “think” something, it’s a good idea to reflect it in your writing.
“Throughout, the listener is treated to Chassagne playing the pipe organ like a bipolar Dracula as twinkling xylophone goes along for the ride.”
Dude, how do you know what any listener other than yourself will be “treated to” on this song? The chances of someone else describing the effect as a pipe organ played by a Bram Stoker character with a mood disorder seem rather slim. Just say what YOU were treated to. It’s not against the law to write an opinion piece as an opinion piece.
Onto the clunky…
“All is varied, yet set into the larger framework that is the whole.”
And what framework is that? Do you even know? Could it be that you didn’t know how best to end a paragraph and resorted to clunky BS that sounds like something The Dude would babble in Mr. Lebowski’s limo?
You certainly outdo yourself with your ending:
“Neon Bible is a rich sonic tapestry of the digital age in whch we fight to find answers in the flashing lights while seeking solace in the untouched corners.”
Wow, did you labor over that lengthy review just so you could write that self-serving conclusion? It certainly had quite an impact. Matt, I know you don’t write music criticism anymore, but where there’s an internet, there’s a way, and there’s still plenty of yours in the vaults to probe. Take care.

Andrzej Lukowski's Review of "Contra" by Vampire Weekend
William Grant's Review of "The Illusion of Safety" by The Hoosiers
Jess Harvell's Review of "Isis/Melvins" Split by Isis and The Melvins
Jared Bier's Review of "As Good as Gone" by Nudge
Jeff Weiss' Review of "Nightmare" by Avenged Sevenfold
Jonathan Dean's Review of "///Y/" by M.I.A.
#1 by Professor Keanbean on January 28, 2010 - 11:37 am
Quote
ouch.
#2 by ChristianH on May 13, 2010 - 7:47 pm
Quote
Christ, I know you’re trying to be funny, but if you’re going to be this intentionally obtuse about every review no one will ever live up to your poorly outlined standards of good music criticism.
If someone states an opinion too definitively, you’ll accuse them of speaking for everyone when they should speak for themselves.
If someone states a fact or describes the sound of a song, you tell them they should stick to opinions.
Here’s an idea: Write one of these about one of your posts and see all the ridiculous things you can criticize about your own writing. If you can’t find anything, you’re just as bad as the critics you’re ripping (or worse, since you’ve clearly put yourself on such a pedestal). If you can, maybe you’ll see the hypocrisy of 90% of your rambling nonsense and either fix it or shut the fuck up.
It’s great that you’re keeping a watch on critics; god knows they need it. But several times, reading your critiques, I shake my head and wonder if you even know what you’re talking about. If you’re the one to call bullshit, you’ve gotta be a lot better.
Respectfully speaking, of course.
#3 by Cary on July 3, 2010 - 3:12 pm
Quote
If I’d written like this reviewer in *grade school* I’d have had it beaten out of me.
Pingback: Jared Bier gets ripped by RipFork…again « RipFork